All that hard paving has made Riverhead oppressively hot in this week's sunshine. Would grass have been preferable? |
THE work has proceeded at snail's pace, but is good to see that planting has this month been introduced at Grimsby's Riverhead and that the scheme is now almost complete.
But there are questions that need to be answered.
What was the point of the scheme? Why was it allowed to fall 10 months behind schedule? Has it enhanced Riverhead and encouraged greater footfall? Does it represent value for money to the taxpayer?
The downside of installing so much paving is that, during a period of hot weather, it has made this part of Grimsby like an oven - a place to avoid.
Not only does concrete capture and store heat from the sunshine, but it reflects it back into the air - very uncomfortable for shoppers.
And, alas, the newly-planted trees and plants are mostly low-growing - there will be little or no leaf canopy to cool the air.
As one Grimsby resident told our reporter: "What's been put in place is not that much different from what existed before.
"The redesign is like Trafalgar Square but without the fountains and lions.
"So much time and money spent on something so unremarkable - a wasted opportunity."
Might grass and reduced amounts of paved footways have provided a preferable alternative (as outside Grimsby Institute)?
The trees will not be large as in this artist's impression, but otherwise the redesign has gone according to script |
No comments:
Post a Comment