HUMBERSTON
WALTHAM
![]() |
| 'Regeneration' scheme may put existing trees, shrubs and flowerbeds in peril |
| Site of the proposed salmon-rearing project |
THERE has been a boost for the firm seeking to build an indoor salmon-rearing 'farm' on wildlife habitat between Grimsby Town FC's Blundell Park ground and the Humber Estuary wall.
Natural England has this week announced that it will not be lodging an objection.
The Government body states: "It is not considered that the proposed development will have significant adverse impacts on the Humber Estuary designated sites Special Area of Conservation and Special Protection Area."
Neither the Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust nor the RSPB has commented on the proposal, though the latter's Grimsby group is maintaining a watching brief.
It is not known if North East Lincolnshire Council's ecology officer will make any recommendations.
The application, which has generated intense controversy (see earlier posts), is likely to be determined by North East Lincolnshire Council planners early in the New Year.
![]() |
| The Northern Sun |
![]() |
| 'Corrosion Bridge' - are council's repair costs out of control? |
A CRUNCH debate on the Corporation Bridge repair project is to be held next week.
With costs escalating, North East Lincolnshire councillors are increasingly fearful that the expensive scheme could become a local equivalent of the HS2 rail debacle.
The original budget for the bridge's restoration was £4.967-million.
The Department of Transport agreed to pay the lion's share, with the council stumping up £1.83-million - about 40 per cent of the total.
The funding was approved by the cabinet in May 2020, but because of lockdown delays, work did not start until February this year.
It was hoped that the project would be completed by contractors Hull-based Spencer Engineering by the end of this year, but it was not to be.
All the while, there has been immense disruption to traffic in Grimsby, and no new target date has been set for completion.
A report seen by the Grimsby News pinpoints the reasons for the cost escalation thus:
*Price increases due to inflation, coupled with extensive unforeseen steelwork repairs being identified to the underside of the bridge
*Additional assessment and design work for replacement of steelwork components
* Hand working around Northern Powergrid cables and other items in relation to unforeseen repairs
At Wednesday evening's meeting, the cabinet will have little choice but to approve further expenditure.
A note to members states: "Due to the extent of works required to repair and replace sections of corroded steelwork previously unforeseen, additional funding is now required to enable the full refurbishment to be completed."
The amount of extra funding sought is being kept under wraps, but, even when approved, it might not be enough.
The note continues: "Until completion of the assessment and design work for replacement of steelwork components to the underneath of the six spans of the bridge, the full extent and costs of the repairs will not be known.
"The costs may be greater if the deterioration of the steel is worse than envisaged."
In the meantime - which gets meaner all the time - the traffic disruption will continue.
The Grimsby News says: This is an alarming situation. North East Lincolnshire Council should have insisted on greater clarity before undertaking the project. It seems to have been oblivious to the financial risks. Was there sufficient rigour in its assessment of the various quotes? The authority is already strapped for cash. Now it faces another big hit - one that could, in the worst case, bring it to its knees. Regardless of the impact on its own reputation for competence, the losers will be precious welfare services and, of course, the long-suffering council taxpayer.
| Sunlight through the trees on an autumn day at former theme park - but is there light at end of tunnel for developers? |
THERE has been a fresh setback to a longstanding scheme to redevelop the former Pleasure Island theme park on the edge of Cleethorpes.
A consortium led by supermarket chain Lidl wants to clear the site, including almost all the trees and shrubs, to make way for a discount supermarket, 272 holiday 'lodges', a games arcade and, eventually, two hotels.
But the Government body, Natural England, has this week again warned that it "may need to oppose the application".
This is because the consortium's agents have so far been unable to provide evidence that their client has either the will or the capacity to safeguard the birds and other wildlife - both on the site and on the neighbouring shoreline which is a designated Special Protection Area.
It is insisting that much more ecological survey work is required - work that will be expensive and take months, if not years, to complete.
Even then, there is no guarantee that it will meet Natural England's stipulations.
Specific NE concerns include:
* Noise disturbance
* After dark light spill
* Air contamination from dust during construction and road traffic during operation
* Holidaymakers spilling on to sensitive shoreline habitat to partake of watersport activities
* Provision of a suitably qualified wildlife ranger/warden and staff
Natural England is not convinced either that the consortium's proposed policy of banning dogs will be steadfast.
It is seeking assurances both on "how this would be secured and on the enforceability of it for the lifespan of the development".
There is also another abiding headache for the consortium.
Despite talks, there is no indication yet that the Environment Agency has withdrawn its longstanding objection over potential flood risk - either from a coastal surge or overtopping of the Buck Beck in the event of extreme rainfall.
The Grimsby News says: This further announcement will add both to the frustration of the consortium and to the embarrassment of its agents, Lichfields, who are evidently not even close to seeing the project through to completion. Something could snap. It would not be at all surprising if, alas for the applicants, the current scheme collapses, possibly sooner rather than later, especially given the current unpropitious state of the economic climate.